The one thing everyone is motivated by? Money. Oddly enough, this person gave me intel without asking for payment. Fortunately it fits the information provided by another source.
If your intel person is a member of the corp and vocal member in corp chat/mails it will be very easy to narrow down who it was, unless he/she is smarter than I give credit him/her credit for. How many people put a space BEFORE and after punctuation? Just what I noticed right off the bat.
Unless you can reverse photoshop'd white blobs, I don't think so.
OnigenAug 03, 2010
does it matter? for all you know they used that person to set a trap.
don't you want to know why he never asked for money?
something is off here, i can smell a trap.
FlozeAug 03, 2010
Is this "intel" going to enable you to pop more Velators and link to the killmails? If so, terrific!
OnigenAug 03, 2010
the ceo of the jerks got to do the pop thing this time.
SoPodMeAlreadyAug 04, 2010
I'll give you guys credit for being good at what you specialise in: ganking low SP players who are unskilled in PvP and flying ships which are poorly-fitted. You also deserve credit for being able to spot a poorly-led corp. Why you get so much pleasure from defeating pathetic opponents is a question best left to the court-appointed psychatrist who will have to evaluate you if you ever let the mask slip.
But what you folks are totally crap at is information security and management of sources. First, your inveterate bragging meant that Captain Fantastic got booted out of this corp which you deemed "fail" after only what, two days?
Next, you post an EVEMail screen grab of a conversation with a source rather than re-typing it. It's pathetically simple to measure the underlines of the original addressees and the partially underscored underlines in the mails you got from the traitor, thus narrowing the field of candidates down to two. And, as Westen says above, I suspect it will be very easy to narrow that down to one, given the ideosyncracies of the text.
Thanks for the amusing demonstration of your professionalism.
Khalia NestuneAug 04, 2010
Awesome, another person who thinks we're professionals :D
Hint: Screenshot, and ability to determine the most possible writer, was not an accident.
SoPodMeAlreadyAug 09, 2010
HIlarious.
First, you respond to rantuket's suggestion that it's possible to identify the Ludi traitor by stating the obvious: one can't reverse photoshop's white blobs. (In other words, "rantuket, you stoopid & we smartz".)
Then, when I point out that you _can_ identify the Ludi traitor because you did such a cackhanded job of applying the white-out, you hint that you deliberately made it possible to determine who the traitor was.
Here's a hint for you: If you're going trot your delusions of superiority out into public, you should at least make the effort to be consistent about exactly how you're demonstrating that you're so superior to all us stupid ordinary people. Admitedly, that suggestion is based on nothing more than watching far too many documentaries about sociopathic personalities, but you might consider taking it onboard.
9 comments
If your intel person is a member of the corp and vocal member in corp chat/mails it will be very easy to narrow down who it was, unless he/she is smarter than I give credit him/her credit for. How many people put a space BEFORE and after punctuation? Just what I noticed right off the bat.
you can see who you sent the message to buddy...
Unless you can reverse photoshop'd white blobs, I don't think so.
does it matter? for all you know they used that person to set a trap.
don't you want to know why he never asked for money?
something is off here, i can smell a trap.
Is this "intel" going to enable you to pop more Velators and link to the killmails? If so, terrific!
the ceo of the jerks got to do the pop thing this time.
I'll give you guys credit for being good at what you specialise in: ganking low SP players who are unskilled in PvP and flying ships which are poorly-fitted. You also deserve credit for being able to spot a poorly-led corp. Why you get so much pleasure from defeating pathetic opponents is a question best left to the court-appointed psychatrist who will have to evaluate you if you ever let the mask slip.
But what you folks are totally crap at is information security and management of sources. First, your inveterate bragging meant that Captain Fantastic got booted out of this corp which you deemed "fail" after only what, two days?
Next, you post an EVEMail screen grab of a conversation with a source rather than re-typing it. It's pathetically simple to measure the underlines of the original addressees and the partially underscored underlines in the mails you got from the traitor, thus narrowing the field of candidates down to two. And, as Westen says above, I suspect it will be very easy to narrow that down to one, given the ideosyncracies of the text.
Thanks for the amusing demonstration of your professionalism.
Awesome, another person who thinks we're professionals :D
Hint: Screenshot, and ability to determine the most possible writer, was not an accident.
HIlarious.
First, you respond to rantuket's suggestion that it's possible to identify the Ludi traitor by stating the obvious: one can't reverse photoshop's white blobs. (In other words, "rantuket, you stoopid & we smartz".)
Then, when I point out that you _can_ identify the Ludi traitor because you did such a cackhanded job of applying the white-out, you hint that you deliberately made it possible to determine who the traitor was.
Here's a hint for you: If you're going trot your delusions of superiority out into public, you should at least make the effort to be consistent about exactly how you're demonstrating that you're so superior to all us stupid ordinary people. Admitedly, that suggestion is based on nothing more than watching far too many documentaries about sociopathic personalities, but you might consider taking it onboard.